|Global Knowledge Gateway||
Research Insights—Integrated Report Quality: Capital Market and Real Effects
by Elmar R. Venter, Associate Professor of Accounting, University of Pretoria in South Africa, Li Chen, Senior Lecturer in Accounting, University of Auckland Business School, Mary E. Barth, Joan E. Horngren Professor of Accounting, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business and Steven Cahan, Professor of Financial Accounting, University of Auckland Business School | March 18, 2018 |
Since the release of the International Integrated Reporting Framework in 2013, worldwide interest in integrated reporting continues to grow. According to the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), more than 1,500 organizations are adopting integrated reporting, including high profile names such as AES Brasil, Clorox, GE, Mitsubishi, Novo Nordisk, Tata Steel, and Vivendi.
There has been strong support for integrated reporting from large accounting firms as well as standard setters and professional accountancy organizations in various countries. Among regulators, the IIRC’s Framework was recently endorsed by China’s Ministry of Finance, and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is encouraging the top 500 listed companies in India to voluntarily adopt integrated reporting. The IIRC continues to move toward the “global adoption” phase of its strategy, the goal of which is to make integrated reporting the norm. Against this backdrop, empirical evidence on the benefits associated with integrated reporting is needed.
In a 2017 Accounting, Organizations and Society article (Vol. 62, p. 43-64), we address the question of how integrated report quality (IRQ) is associated with firm value by identifying and empirically assessing two channels for the positive association between IRQ and firm value:
- A capital market channel that relates to higher quality information for outside providers of capital.
- A real effects channel that relates to higher quality internal decision making.
We focus on these channels because of the two objectives included in the IIRC’s Framework: (1) improving the quality of information available to outside providers of financial capital to enable a more efficient capital allocation, and (2) supporting integrated internal thinking, decision making, and actions that focus on value creation for the organization over the short, medium and long term.
In contrast to accounting standards or other types of disclosure regulation, such as the US Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) Form 10-K, integrated reporting has the dual objective of providing information to both external and internal decision makers. Our objective is to shed light on the extent to which, and how, integrated reporting achieves this.
Our evidence is based on IRQ scores determined by a team of professors at the University of Cape Town for the purpose of supporting EY’s annual Excellence in Integrated Reporting awards in South Africa, which is the only country that mandates integrated reporting.
Findings from our study include:
- Confirmation that there is a positive association between IRQ and firm value.
- Higher IRQ is associated with greater liquidity, a capital market effect, and higher expected future cash flows, a real effect.
- There is no evidence of a relation between IRQ and cost of capital—another capital market effect.
The expectation of higher future cash flows for firms with higher IRQ is borne out by higher future realized operating cash flow. But analysts’ target price forecast accuracy is not, which adds support for the real effects channel, as does finding that IRQ is positively associated with firms’ investment efficiency.
Importantly, the relations we document include controls for the issuance of a standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) report as well as accounting quality and overall disclosure quality, among other factors. These relations reveals that high quality integrated reports are associated with benefits incremental to those associated with existing reports, such as standalone CSR reports.
In addition, to provide insights into which features of integrated reports are associated with firm value, we mapped the IRQ evaluation criteria EY uses to rate the reports into 12 categories that reflect the guiding principles and content elements of the IIRC’s Framework. Based on this, we found that connectivity, stakeholder relationships, materiality, and conciseness are the most important drivers of the findings for firm value and for its liquidity and expected cash flow components. The importance of connectivity is particularly pertinent because connectivity is closely linked to integrated thinking, which is key to achieving the dual objective of providing information to both external and internal decision makers.
Managers, practitioners, standard-setters, regulators, investors, and other interested stakeholders should find these results noteworthy in evaluating the merits of integrated reporting. The European Commission, the US SEC and other regulators have expressed interest in integrated reporting and our results could help inform their deliberations on its future in their jurisdictions.
The IIRC may also find our results encouraging as it promotes the global adoption of integrated reporting. Investors, particularly institutional investors with policies for responsible investment, may also find our results informative in evaluating their resource allocation decisions.
The full article is available online.
Like what you see here? Subscribe to The Latest, our customizable update sent every two weeks.
Do you have a perspective you'd like to share with the global profession? Email Gateway@ifac.org to inquire about becoming a Gateway contributing author.