Research Insights—Integrated Report Quality: Capital Market and Real Effects

Elmar R. Venter, Li Chen, Steven Cahan, Mary E. Barth | March 18, 2018 |

Since the release of the International Integrated Reporting Framework in 2013, worldwide interest in integrated reporting continues to grow. According to the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), more than 1,500 organizations are adopting integrated reporting, including high profile names such as AES Brasil, Clorox, GE, Mitsubishi, Novo Nordisk, Tata Steel, and Vivendi.

There has been strong support for integrated reporting from large accounting firms as well as standard setters and professional accountancy organizations in various countries. Among regulators, the IIRC’s Framework was recently endorsed by China’s Ministry of Finance, and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is encouraging the top 500 listed companies in India to voluntarily adopt integrated reporting. The IIRC continues to move toward the “global adoption” phase of its strategy, the goal of which is to make integrated reporting the norm. Against this backdrop, empirical evidence on the benefits associated with integrated reporting is needed.

In a 2017 Accounting, Organizations and Society article (Vol. 62, p. 43-64), we address the question of how integrated report quality (IRQ) is associated with firm value by identifying and empirically assessing two channels for the positive association between IRQ and firm value:

  1. A capital market channel that relates to higher quality information for outside providers of capital.
  2. A real effects channel that relates to higher quality internal decision making.

We focus on these channels because of the two objectives included in the IIRC’s Framework: (1) improving the quality of information available to outside providers of financial capital to enable a more efficient capital allocation, and (2) supporting integrated internal thinking, decision making, and actions that focus on value creation for the organization over the short, medium and long term.

In contrast to accounting standards or other types of disclosure regulation, such as the US Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) Form 10-K, integrated reporting has the dual objective of providing information to both external and internal decision makers. Our objective is to shed light on the extent to which, and how, integrated reporting achieves this.

Our evidence is based on IRQ scores determined by a team of professors at the University of Cape Town for the purpose of supporting EY’s annual Excellence in Integrated Reporting awards in South Africa, which is the only country that mandates integrated reporting.

Findings from our study include:

  • Confirmation that there is a positive association between IRQ and firm value.
  • Higher IRQ is associated with greater liquidity, a capital market effect, and higher expected future cash flows, a real effect.
  • There is no evidence of a relation between IRQ and cost of capital—another capital market effect.

The expectation of higher future cash flows for firms with higher IRQ is borne out by higher future realized operating cash flow. But analysts’ target price forecast accuracy is not, which adds support for the real effects channel, as does finding that IRQ is positively associated with firms’ investment efficiency.

Importantly, the relations we document include controls for the issuance of a standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) report as well as accounting quality and overall disclosure quality, among other factors. These relations reveals that high quality integrated reports are associated with benefits incremental to those associated with existing reports, such as standalone CSR reports.

In addition, to provide insights into which features of integrated reports are associated with firm value, we mapped the IRQ evaluation criteria EY uses to rate the reports into 12 categories that reflect the guiding principles and content elements of the IIRC’s Framework. Based on this, we found that connectivity, stakeholder relationships, materiality, and conciseness are the most important drivers of the findings for firm value and for its liquidity and expected cash flow components. The importance of connectivity is particularly pertinent because connectivity is closely linked to integrated thinking, which is key to achieving the dual objective of providing information to both external and internal decision makers.

Managers, practitioners, standard-setters, regulators, investors, and other interested stakeholders should find these results noteworthy in evaluating the merits of integrated reporting. The European Commission, the US SEC and other regulators have expressed interest in integrated reporting and our results could help inform their deliberations on its future in their jurisdictions.

The IIRC may also find our results encouraging as it promotes the global adoption of integrated reporting. Investors, particularly institutional investors with policies for responsible investment, may also find our results informative in evaluating their resource allocation decisions.

The full article is available online.

Elmar R. Venter

Associate Professor of Accounting, University of Pretoria in South Africa

Elmar R. Venter is Associate Professor of Accounting at the University of Pretoria in South Africa. He is a Chartered Accountant (South Africa) and holds a PhD in Accounting from the University of Auckland. He serves as Vice-President Conferences of the International Association for Accounting Education & Research (IAAER).

Li Chen

Senior Lecturer in Accounting, University of Auckland Business School

Li Chen is a senior lecturer in Accounting at the University of Auckland Business School. Her research interests are in the areas of financial reporting and disclosure, financial analysts, corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, and integrated reporting. Dr Chen holds a PhD from the University of Auckland.

Steven Cahan

Professor of Financial Accounting, University of Auckland Business School

Steven Cahan is a Professor of Financial Accounting at the University of Auckland Business School. He is a Chartered Accountant, a Fellow of Chartered Accountants Australia New Zealand, past President of Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand and a former editor of the journal Accounting & Finance. Professor Cahan holds a PhD from the University of Colorado, Boulder.

Mary E. Barth

Joan E. Horngren Professor of Accounting, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business

Mary E. Barth is the Joan E. Horngren Professor of Accounting at the Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.  She was a member of the International Accounting Standards Board, and is the Senior Editor of The Accounting Review and has been named to the Accounting Hall of Fame. Professor Barth holds a PhD from Stanford University and DSc(HC)s from Lancaster University and London Business School.

Join the Conversation

To leave a comment below, login or register with IFAC.org

Thank you for your interest in our publications. These valuable works are the product of substantial time, effort and resources, which you acknowledge by accepting the following terms of use. You may not reproduce, store, transmit in any form or by any means, with the exception of non-commercial use (e.g., professional and personal reference and research work), translate, modify or create derivative works or adaptations based on such publications, or any part thereof, without the prior written permission of IFAC.

Our reproduction and translation policies, as well as our online permission request and inquiry system, are accessible on the Permissions Information web page.

For additional information, please read our website Terms of Use. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.