To enhance the quality and consistency of audits, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard-setting board under the auspices of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), is continuing to advance its project to clarify its auditing standards. At its meeting in April 2007, the IAASB approved for public comment exposure drafts of proposed International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 200 (Revised and Redrafted), Overall Objective of the Independent Auditor, and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with International Standards on Auditing; proposed ISA 250 (Redrafted), The Auditor's Responsibilities Relating to Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements; and proposed ISA 500 (Redrafted), Considering the Relevance and Reliability of Audit Evidence. These have all been redrafted in accordance with the IAASB's new drafting conventions designed to enhance the clarity of its pronouncements.

Overall Objective of the Independent Auditor, and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with ISAs

The Preface to the International Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services (Preface) was reissued in January 2007 to reflect the effect of the new drafting conventions being used for the purposes of ISAs. It contains important statements about the authority of ISAs and the obligations of auditors who follow those standards. Because the amended Preface may not be adopted in certain jurisdictions, the IAASB decided that these statements should be incorporated within the ISAs themselves. Accordingly, proposed ISA 200 (Revised and Redrafted) incorporates the provisions of the amended Preface relevant to ISAs. The proposed ISA also describes the nature of an audit of financial statements and related concepts that provide the basis for a proper understanding of the conduct of an audit, the overall objective of the auditor, and the objectives and requirements stated in the ISAs. "The proposed standard provides a clearer explanation of relevant concepts which should be helpful to auditors and others with an interest in audits and auditing standards. By incorporating the relevant provisions of the Preface into this ISA, we hope to give them greater prominence and to ensure that the obligation of auditors using ISAs to follow all their requirements is directly imposed through the standards themselves," states John Kellas, IAASB Chairman.

Status of the Clarity Project

The proposed ISAs have been drafted in accordance with the IAASB's new drafting conventions. These conventions include the specification of an objective within each ISA and separate sections for requirements and application and other material. With the release of the exposure draft of proposed ISA 200 (Revised and Redrafted), the IAASB has issued a complete list of the objectives to be contained in each ISA for the information of respondents. These are subject to revision as relevant exposure drafts are developed and exposed for comment. The IAASB has now issued four final ISAs drafted in accordance with the new conventions and, including the three just released, 15 exposure drafts of ISAs. The IAASB expects to issue a further 15 exposure drafts this year, and to complete all 34 ISAs as final standards by the end of 2008. As a result of this project, 21 extant ISAs will have been fully revised or updated and redrafted in the last five years and the remaining 11 will have been redrafted in accordance with the new conventions, providing more clarity as to their requirements and thereby improving the consistency of their application. Further information on the Clarity project may be obtained from the IAASB Clarity Status Report.

How to Comment

Comments on the exposure drafts of proposed ISA 200 (Revised and Redrafted) and proposed ISA 500 (Redrafted) are requested by September 15, 2007. The comment period for proposed ISA 500 (Redrafted) is tied to that of proposed ISA 200 (Revised and Redrafted), because it is proposed that the requirement of extant ISA 500 for the auditor to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence be transferred to proposed ISA 200 (Revised and Redrafted). Comments on the exposure draft of proposed ISA 250 (Redrafted) are requested by July 31, 2007. The exposure drafts may be viewed by going to http://www.ifac.org/EDs. Comments should be submitted by email to EDComments@ifac.org. They may also be faxed to IAASB ED Comments, at +1-212-286-9570 or mailed to IAASB ED Comments at 545 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10017, USA. All comments will be considered a matter of public record and will ultimately be posted on the IFAC website.

About the IAASB and IFAC

The objective of the IAASB is to serve the public interest by setting high quality auditing and assurance standards and by facilitating the convergence of international and national standards, thereby enhancing the quality and uniformity of practice throughout the world and strengthening public confidence in the global auditing and assurance profession. The Public Interest Oversight Board oversees the activities of the IAASB and, as one element of that oversight, establishes its due process and working procedures. IFAC is the worldwide organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 155 members and associates in 118 countries, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry and commerce. In addition to setting international auditing and assurance standards through the IAASB, IFAC, through its independent standard-setting boards, sets international ethics, education, and public sector accounting standards. It also issues guidance to encourage high quality performance by professional accountants in business. Further information about IAASB may be obtained from its website: http://www.iaasb.org. The PIOB website address is http://www.ipiob.org.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard-setting board under the auspices of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), has issued a communication on auditors' reports on special purpose audit engagements. The purpose of the communication is to advise auditors that reports for special purpose audit engagements can, with appropriate amendments, be issued in the form of the illustrative report in paragraph 60 of International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 700, The Independent Auditor's Report on a Complete Set of General Purpose Financial Statements. The communication provides additional information in this regard as well as links to the relevant ISAs. The communication can be viewed on the IAASB website.

About the IAASB and IFAC

The objective of the IAASB is to serve the public interest by setting high quality auditing and assurance standards and by facilitating the convergence of international and national standards, thereby enhancing the quality and uniformity of practice throughout the world and strengthening public confidence in the global auditing and assurance profession. The Public Interest Oversight Board oversees the activities of the IAASB and, as one element of that oversight, establishes its due process and working procedures. IFAC is the worldwide organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies.

IFAC is comprised of 155 members and associates in 118 countries, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry and commerce. In addition to setting international auditing and assurance standards through the IAASB, IFAC, through its independent standard-setting boards, sets international ethics, education, and public sector accounting standards. It also issues guidance to encourage high quality performance by professional accountants in business.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard-setting board under the auspices of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), is seeking comments on an exposure draft (ED) of proposed International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 550 (Revised and Redrafted), Related Parties. The IAASB is also seeking comments on proposed ISA 570, Going Concern, which has been redrafted in the new style designed to enhance the clarity of IAASB pronouncements.

Related Party Relationships and Transactions

The involvement of related parties in major corporate scandals encouraged the IAASB to review its current auditing standard on the subject. Following earlier consultations, the IAASB has decided to re-expose its revised proposals because of the significance of the changes made in response to the consultations. The overall aim of the project is to enhance the auditor's consideration of related parties and related party transactions in an audit of financial statements, establishing an approach that requires the auditor to assess the risks of misstatement and direct audit work accordingly. The proposals in the re-exposure draft are intended to make the auditor's responsibilities clearer, distinguishing those cases where the accounting framework includes disclosure and other reporting requirements, and those where it includes no or inadequate requirements. The exposure draft includes a new definition of a "related party" to serve as a minimum level for the purposes of the audit. It also improves the delineation between the auditor's procedures to identify relevant risks of material misstatement and his or her responses to the assessed risks. The proposed standard also emphasizes the need for the auditor to be aware of related parties and the extent to which they affect the financial statements, even where the financial reporting framework applied in preparing the financial statements does not establish requirements for related parties (or does so inadequately). John Kellas, Chairman of the IAASB, explains: "The proposed standard makes clear that the auditor has three objectives in considering related parties: to obtain sufficient evidence about the required accounting and disclosure of related party information and transactions; to understand how related party transactions and relationships affect the view given by the financial statements; and to identify fraud risk factors arising from related party relationships that may require further consideration."

New Clarity Exposure Draft

As part of its comprehensive program to enhance the clarity of its standards and facilitate convergence, the IAASB has also issued an exposure draft of proposed ISA 570 (Redrafted). The exposure draft forms part of the IAASB's ambitious 18-month program to redraft existing standards and to develop new and revised standards following the new drafting conventions, which were developed after extensive consultation with interested parties, such as the IAASB's Consultative Advisory Group and national auditing standard setters, and public consultation. The new drafting conventions are explained in the Preface to the International Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services, which was issued in January 2007. How to Comment Comments on the exposure draft of proposed ISA 550 (Revised and Redrafted) are requested by June 30, 2007. Comments on the exposure draft of proposed ISA 570 (Redrafted) are requested by May 31, 2007. The EDs may be viewed by going to http://www.ifac.org/EDs. Comments should be submitted by email to EDComments@ifac.org. They may also be faxed to IAASB ED Comments, at +1-212-286-9570 or mailed to IAASB ED Comments at 545 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10017, USA. All comments will be considered a matter of public record and will ultimately be posted on the IFAC website.

About the IAASB and IFAC

The objective of the IAASB is to serve the public interest by setting high quality auditing and assurance standards and by facilitating the convergence of international and national standards, thereby enhancing the quality and uniformity of practice throughout the world and strengthening public confidence in the global auditing and assurance profession. The Public Interest Oversight Board oversees the activities of the IAASB and, as one element of that oversight, establishes its due process and working procedures. IFAC is the worldwide organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 155 members and associates in 118 countries, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry and commerce. In addition to setting international auditing and assurance standards through the IAASB, IFAC, through its independent standard-setting boards, sets international ethics, education, and public sector accounting standards. It also issues guidance to encourage high quality performance by professional accountants in business.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard-setting board under the auspices of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), has issued the first four final International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) redrafted as part of its comprehensive program to enhance the clarity of its standards. It has also approved amendments to the Preface to International Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services, which establishes the conventions to be used by the IAASB in drafting future ISAs and the obligations of auditors who follow those standards. A report developed by the IAASB staff on the status of the IAASB's clarity project was also released summarizing these and other developments. New ISAsThe IAASB has issued the following four redrafted standards:

• ISA 240, The Auditor's Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements;
• ISA 300, Planning an Audit of Financial Statements;
• ISA 315, Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment; and
• ISA 330, The Auditor's Responses to Assessed Risks.

The four redrafted ISAs and the amended Preface were exposed for public comment in October 2005. The IAASB refined its clarity drafting conventions based on the comments received to the exposure drafts and after extensive consultation with interested parties, such as the IAASB's Consultative Advisory Group and national auditing standard setters. In developing these final standards, the IAASB improved the consistency with which the conventions were applied to the ISAs and considered the need for them to be applicable to audits of entities of all sizes.

"The release of these final ISAs in the new drafting style represents an important milestone for the IAASB as it works to improve the clarity of its international standards," states John Kellas, IAASB Chairman. "The IAASB is satisfied that these four redrafted ISAs are clearer and the expectation of consistent application by professional accountants worldwide has been strengthened. We are now proceeding with the application of the clarity conventions to all the ISAs."

The four redrafted ISAs have a provisional effective date for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. While the final common effective date for all redrafted ISAs will be determined as the IAASB's agenda progresses, it will not be earlier than December 15, 2008. The amended Preface contains important statements about the authority of the IAASB's standards.

In order to embed these within the ISAs themselves, the IAASB intends to revise ISA 200, Objective and General Principles Governing an Audit of Financial Statements to incorporate relevant provisions of the amended Preface. When ISA 200 is revised and exposed for public comment in 2007, respondents will be invited to comment on the material derived from the amended Preface in that new context. Clarity Project Update Progress that the IAASB has made so far and the direction it plans to take as it continues to redraft standards is outlined in the report Status of the IAASB's Work to Improve the Clarity of Its Standards. This staff report describes the main changes to the IAASB's standards arising from the application of its clarity drafting conventions and explains the IAASB's approach to implementing the conventions to all ISAs. How to Access The four ISAs and the Preface may be downloaded free-of-charge from the IFAC online bookstore at http://www.ifac.org/store. They will also be included in the 2007 Handbook of International Auditing, Assurance, and Ethics Pronouncements. The status report on the clarity project may be downloaded from the IAASB's website at http://www.iaasb.org.

About the IAASB and IFAC The objective of the IAASB is to serve the public interest by setting high quality auditing and assurance standards and by facilitating the convergence of international and national standards, thereby enhancing the quality and uniformity of practice throughout the world and strengthening public confidence in the global auditing and assurance profession. The Public Interest Oversight Board oversees the activities of the IAASB and, as one element of that oversight, establishes its due process and working procedures.

IFAC is the worldwide organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 155 members and associates in 118 countries, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry and commerce. In addition to setting international auditing and assurance standards through the IAASB, IFAC, through its independent standard-setting boards, sets international ethics, education, and public sector accounting standards. It also issues guidance to encourage high quality performance by professional accountants in business.

At its most recent meeting in London in December, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard-setting board under the auspices of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), approved new proposals to enhance the written representations that auditors request from management, those charged with governance and others, as well as five new exposure drafts written in accordance with its new clarity drafting conventions.

Written Representations

The proposals, which are incorporated in proposed International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 580 (Revised and Redrafted), Written Representations, provide for general written representations regarding the financial statements, including internal control, and the completeness of information made available to the auditor, and for written representations about specific assertions in the financial statements. "The aim of this project was to improve the quality and appropriateness of written representations sought by the auditor and, in particular, to deal with concerns about whether auditors may over-rely on representations at the expense of other evidence," explains John Kellas, IAASB Chairman.

New Clarity Exposure Drafts

As part of its comprehensive program to enhance the clarity of international standards, the IAASB has also issued the following exposure drafts of proposed ISAs:

• ISA 230 (Redrafted), Audit Documentation;
• ISA 540 (Revised and Redrafted), Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and Related Disclosures;
• ISA 560 (Redrafted), Subsequent Events;
• ISA 610 (Redrafted), The Auditor's Consideration of the Internal Audit Function; and
• ISA 720 (Redrafted), The Auditor's Responsibility in Relation to Other Information in Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements.

Proposed ISA 540 (Revised and Redrafted) is a combination of ISA 540 (Revised), Auditing Accounting Estimates and Related Disclosures (Other Than Those Involving Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures) and ISA 545, Auditing Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The IAASB approved ISA 540 (Revised) in September 2006 as a basis for applying the clarity drafting conventions. As part of the redrafting of ISA 540 (Revised), the IAASB decided that the similarities between estimates and fair value information could be emphasized, and redundancy eliminated, by combining ISA 540 (Revised) and ISA 545 within the proposed revised and redrafted ISA 540.

"The proposed ISA 540 (Revised and Redrafted) will reinforce best practice and cause the auditor to give appropriate attention to areas of accounting judgment, such as assumptions, and to possible bias. The other proposed redrafted standards contain clear requirements and easy to understand application guidance," notes Mr. Kellas.

The exposure drafts form part of the IAASB's ambitious 18-month program to redraft existing standards and to develop new and revised standards following the new drafting conventions, which were developed after extensive consultation with interested parties, such as the IAASB's Consultative Advisory Group and national auditing standard setters, and public consultation. Key elements of the new drafting conventions include: basing each standard on the objective of the auditor with respect to the subject matter of the standard; separating the requirements that the auditor is required to follow from guidance on their application; eliminating the present tense to describe actions by the auditor, which raised ambiguity about whether such actions were required; and other structural and drafting improvements to enhance the overall readability and understandability of the standards. Standards redrafted in this way are described as "redrafted." If further revision has been undertaken, a standard is described as "revised and redrafted."

How to Comment

Comments on the exposure drafts of proposed redrafted ISAs 230, 560, 610 and 720 are requested by March 31, 2007. Comments on the exposure drafts of proposed ISAs 540 (Revised and Redrafted) and 580 (Revised and Redrafted) are requested by April 30, 2007. The exposure drafts may be viewed by going to http://www.ifac.org/EDs. Comments may be submitted by email to EDComments@ifac.org. They can also be faxed to the attention of the Executive Director, Professional Standards at +1 (212) 286-9570 or mailed to IFAC, 545 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10017, USA. All comments will be considered a matter of public record and will ultimately be posted of IFAC's website.

About the IAASB and IFAC The objective of the IAASB, an independent standard-setting board within IFAC, is to serve the public interest by setting high quality auditing and assurance standards and by facilitating the convergence of international and national standards, thereby enhancing the quality and uniformity of practice throughout the world and strengthening public confidence in the global auditing and assurance profession. The Public Interest Oversight Board oversees the activities of the IAASB and, as one element of that oversight, establishes the criteria for its due process and working procedures.

IFAC is the worldwide organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 155 members and associates in 118 countries, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry and commerce. In addition to setting international auditing and assurance standards through the IAASB, IFAC, through its independent standard-setting boards, sets international ethics, education, and public sector accounting standards. It also issues guidance to encourage high quality performance by professional accountants in business.

The objective of this paper is to set out the policy of the IAASB on the question: What modifications may a national standard setter that adopts the International Standards promulgated by the IAASB as its national standards make to the International Standards while still asserting that the resulting national standards conform to the International Standards?