The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) today released for public exposure proposed changes to the definition of “engagement team” in the IESBA Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (the Code).

The proposals address comments received by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board on its Exposure Draft (ED) on ISA 610, Using the Work of Internal Auditors. A number of respondents to that ED pointed out the perceived inconsistency between the independence requirements for external auditors under the Code and the use of internal auditors to perform external audit procedures.

“Through this Exposure Draft, the IESBA seeks to ascertain whether the proposed changes to the definition adequately clarify the term "engagement team" and eliminate the perception that the Code and the ISA are in conflict. The IESBA believes this will contribute to more consistent application of the Code, which is critical to our mission to support the global adoption and implementation of the Code of Ethics,” said Ken Dakdduk, chair of the IESBA.

How to comment
The IESBA invites all stakeholders to comment on its proposals in the Exposure Draft, Proposed Change to the Definition of “Engagement Team.” To submit a comment, visit the IESBA website at www.ifac.org/ethics. Comments on the Exposure Draft are requested by May 31, 2012.

About the IESBA
The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) is an independent standard-setting board that develops and issues, in the public interest, high-quality ethical standards and other pronouncements for professional accountants worldwide. Through its activities, the IESBA develops the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, which establishes ethical requirements for professional accountants. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IESBA are facilitated by IFAC. Please visit www.ifac.org/ethics for more information.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 167 members and associates in 127 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

#  #  #

Objective

To provide guidance for professional accountants on how best to act in the public interest when they become aware of a suspected illegal act (or non-compliance with laws and regulations (NOCLAR)).

Task Force progress / Board discussions to date

At its October 2009 meeting, the IESBA discussed a draft project proposal to develop additional guidance for professional accountants when encountering a suspected fraud or illegal act.

Objective

To revise Sections 220, Conflicts of Interest, and 310, Potential Conflicts, of the Code to establish more specific requirements and provide more comprehensive guidance to support professional accountants in public practice and professional accountants in business, respectively, in identifying, evaluating and managing conflicts of interest.

Objective

To reconsider the provisions in the Code that address an inadvertent violation of the Code.

Liesbet Haustermans became a member of the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) in January 2016. She was nominated by Deloitte. Prior to serving as a member, she served from 2010 to 2015 as a Technical Advisor to a former member of the IESBA.

Ms. Haustermans works for Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited Global Independence and is Deloitte’s Regional Independence Leader for Europe, Middle East, and Africa. She is also a Director at Deloitte Belgium

Ms. Haustermans is a Belgian Certified Auditor and a member of the Institut des Réviseurs d'Entreprises (Belgian Institute of Auditors).

She was recently appointed as Chair of Accountancy Europe's Professional Ethics and Competences Working Party.

Ms. Haustermans has a master’s degree in commercial engineering and a master's degree in audit and accounting from the Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.

This summary is intended to be a resource to aid users in gaining a quick overview and understanding of the range of prohibitions imposed by the Code on professional accountants when they undertake audits of PIEs. It is intended to help facilitate the adoption and effective implementation of the Code by IFAC member bodies and others.

This publication does not constitute an authoritative pronouncements of the board, nor does it amend or override the Code.

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) is proposing changes to its Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (the IESBA Code) to provide additional guidance to professional accountants in business and in public practice concerning conflicts of interest, and to make revisions to provide more comprehensive guidance in identifying, evaluating, and managing conflicts of interest.

The IESBA approved this project in October 2009.  It examined two sections of the IESBA Code that address conflicts—Section 220, for professional accountants in public practice, and Section 310, for professional accountants in business. In the IESBA’s view, the approach to be taken by a professional accountant in public practice and a professional accountant in business should be broadly similar.  The proposal recognizes, however, that conflicts of interest will typically arise in different circumstances for accountants in public practice, particularly because a conflict of interest may arise from professional services provided by other members of the accountant's firm.

Ken Dakdduk, IESBA Chair, notes, “The proposed changes will provide more specific requirements and guidance for a professional accountant in applying the conceptual framework when identifying, evaluating, and managing conflicts of interest. This includes a clearer description of what is meant under the IESBA Code by the term ‘conflict of interest.’ The changes should assist professional accountants in early identification of a potential conflict of interest, and prompt accountants to evaluate their ability to be objective in that situation and meet the other fundamental principles in the IESBA Code.  From the perspective of the public, timely identification of potential conflicts of interest can provide affected parties with more time to engage an alternative service provider.”

The proposed guidance also calls for professional accountants in business to be alert to interests and relationships that a reasonable and informed third party would be likely to conclude might compromise compliance with the fundamental principles. Further, the IESBA proposal would strengthen the guidance on threats created by compensation and incentive arrangements.

How to comment
The IESBA invites all stakeholders to comment on its proposals. To access the exposure draft and submit a comment, visit the IESBA website at www.ethicsboard.org. Comments on the exposure draft Proposed Changes to the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants Addressing Conflicts of Interest are requested by March 31, 2012.

About the IESBA
The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) is an independent standard-setting board that develops and issues, in the public interest, high-quality ethical standards and other pronouncements for professional accountants worldwide. Through its activities, the IESBA develops the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, which establishes ethical requirements for professional accountants. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IESBA are facilitated by IFAC. Please visit www.ethicsboard.org for more information.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 167 members and associates in 127 countries and jurisdictions, representing approximately 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.