The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) today released its revised International Standard on Auditing 570 (Revised 2024), Going Concern. The revised standard responds to corporate failures that raised questions regarding auditors’ responsibilities by significantly enhancing the auditor’s work in evaluating management’s assessment of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2026, the standard will also increase consistency in auditing practices and strengthen transparency through communications and auditor reporting on matters related to going concern in a consistent manner.

ISA 570 (Revised 2024) introduces several key changes:

• Robust risk assessment. Auditors must conduct, in a more timely manner, thorough risk assessments to determine whether events or conditions are identified that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
• Evaluating Management’s Assessment. Auditors must evaluate management’s assessment of going concern irrespective of whether events or conditions are identified. In doing so, auditors must consider the potential for management bias and evaluate the underlying method, significant assumptions, and data used when management formed its assessment. Additionally, auditors must evaluate whether management’s judgements and decisions indicate potential bias.
• Extended date of evaluation period. The auditor’s evaluation period for going concern now extends at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements, contributing to an assessment of more relevant, decision-useful information.
• Enhanced transparency. The standard requires clearer communication in the auditor’s report about the auditor’s responsibilities and work related to going concern and strengthened communications with those charged with governance and external parties.

“This milestone addresses calls from investors, regulators, and other stakeholders for more robust audit procedures related to going concern. It provides decision-useful, entity-specific information in the auditor’s report regarding the auditor’s work and responsibilities for going concern,” noted IAASB Chair Tom Seidenstein. “The changes in the standard further advance high-quality audits and help narrow the expectation gap, thereby supporting users’ interests and broader financial stability.”

To support successful implementation, the IAASB also developed a fact sheet and Basis for Conclusions, which are available on the IAASB’s website. The IAASB will also issue a frequently asked questions document and technical overview video to support the revised standard’s implementation.

About the IAASB
The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board develops auditing, assurance, related services, and quality management standards and guidance in the public interest that support consistent performance of quality engagements. Along with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants, the IAASB is part of the International Foundation for Ethics and Audit. The Public Interest Oversight Board oversees IAASB and IESBA activities and the public interest responsiveness of the standards. For copyright, trademark, and permissions information, please visit Permissions.

IFAC (International Federation of Accountants) has submitted a response to the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) proposed updates to the FATF Guidance on AML/CFT measures and financial inclusion (the updated Guidance), reflecting the latest amendments to the FATF Standards. 

• Consultation Paper seeks views on auditor independence matters pertaining to audits of Investment Schemes when these Schemes involve “Connected Parties”

• The consultation aims to inform the IESBA’s consideration of whether its International Independence Standards are sufficiently clear and fit for purpose for such audits

• The IESBA welcomes comments from all interested parties, including financial industry representatives, audit firms, experts, investors, regulators and jurisdictional standard setters

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) today issued a Consultation Paper seeking feedback on whether revisions to the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants^TM (including International Independence Standards^TM) (the “Code”) are necessary to address the independence of auditors when they carry out audits of Collective Investment Vehicles (CIVs) and Pension Funds (collectively referred to as “Investment Schemes” or “Schemes”).

Investment Schemes enable investors to pool their funds and often rely on external parties (“Connected Parties”) for functions typically managed internally in conventional corporate structures. This structure introduces specific relationships that are highlighted in the Consultation Paper and need to be carefully considered to ensure that any threats to auditor independence are identified and appropriately addressed.  

According to the Investment Company 2024 Factbook, total net assets of worldwide regulated open-end funds, which include CIVs, stood at around US$69 trillion in 2023. As collective investment structures continue to evolve and the number of investors and assets under management increase globally, the IESBA recognizes the need for robust and clear independence standards and guidance to maintain public trust in the audits of these Schemes.

“Investment Schemes play a critical role in both the savings and retirement of ordinary citizens and in the development and growth of our economies,” said Gabriela Figueiredo Dias, Chair of IESBA. “This underscores the high level of public interest, and therefore the fundamental role of the independent audit, in this segment of the global financial system. Through this consultation, we are inviting stakeholders to share their insights and perspectives on specific matters to ensure that our independence standards remain relevant and capable of consistent application across audits of these Schemes globally.”

Key areas of focus include:

• The definition of "related entity" in the Code and its applicability to audits of Investment Schemes.
• The Connected Parties that should be considered in relation to the assessment of auditor independence with respect to the audit of an Investment Scheme.
• The application of the Code’s conceptual framework when assessing threats to independence resulting from interests, relationships, or circumstances between the auditor of an Investment Scheme and Connected Parties.

The development of the Consultation Paper was informed by desktop research and stakeholder outreach during the course of 2024.

How to Comment

Stakeholders are invited to submit their comments electronically through the IESBA website by June 30, 2025. The feedback will inform the IESBA Project Team's report and recommendations to the IESBA on whether enhancements or clarifications to the Code are warranted.

For more information and to access the Consultation Paper, please visit the IESBA website.