The IAASB has published video introductions to the new and revised quality management standards in English, French and Spanish. The videos explain the key aspects of the three standards to help stakeholders begin their implementation efforts.

The IAASB recently approved the suite of new and revised quality management standards, which will be released following approval from the Public Interest Oversight Board of the due process later this year. The new and revised quality management standards will become effective on December 15, 2022.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) Technology Working Group today released a new non-authoritative frequently asked questions publication on using automated tools and techniques in identifying and assessing risks of material misstatements in accordance with International Standard on Auditing 315 (Revised 2019), Identifying and Assessing Risks of Material Misstatement. 

The publication assists auditors to understand the types of automated tools and techniques that can be used, and how they can be used, in performing risk assessment procedures. It also addresses considerations regarding the entity’s use of machine learning or artificial intelligence when performing risk assessment procedures.

This publication does not amend or override the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs), the texts of which alone are authoritative. Reading the publication is not a substitute for reading the ISAs.

This non-authoritative Frequently Asked Questions document assists auditors in understanding of the types of ATT could be used, and how they can be used, in performing risk assessment procedures in accordance with International Standard on Auditing 315 (Revised 2019), Identifying and Assessing Risks of Material Misstatement.

Today the IAASB released a key takeaways publication following three recent virtual roundtables with experts and leaders exploring issues and challenges related to fraud and going concern. These roundtables focused on:

1. The impact of technology advancements on fraud perpetration and detection;
2. The “expectation gap”, or differences between public perceptions and the auditor’s responsibilities for fraud and going concern; and
3. Fraud and going concern in audits of less complex entities.

Today’s publication details the roundtables and what we heard. The input from these roundtables comprise one aspect of the IAASB’s broader information-gathering activities related to fraud and going concern that will be considered in determining possible future actions.

The full roundtable recordings, including individual breakout sessions, are available on the IAASB’s YouTube channel:

• Fraud Technology Roundtable
• Expectation Gap Roundtable
• Fraud and Going Concern Procedures in Less Complex Entities Roundtable

If you would like to know more about the IAASB’s work on fraud and going concern, please visit the project pages on fraud and going concern for further information. The IAASB also encourages all interested stakeholders to respond to the IAASB’s related Discussion Paper, Fraud and Going Concern in an Audit of Financial Statements: Exploring the Differences Between Public Perceptions About the Role of the Auditor and the Auditor’s Responsibilities in a Financial Statement Audit, which is currently open for consultation until February 1, 2021.

The IAASB recently hosted three virtual roundtables with experts and leaders exploring issues and challenges related to fraud and going concern. These roundtables focused on:

Fraud and going concern are important public interest issues for the IAASB. To allow adequate time for all of our stakeholders to respond to the IAASB’s Discussion Paper, Fraud and Going Concern in an Audit of Financial Statements: Exploring the Differences Between Public Perceptions About the Role of the Auditor and the Auditor’s Responsibilities in a Financial Statement Audit, the closing date of this consultation has been extended to February 1, 2021. This extension takes into account the upcoming holidays and our stakeholder’s capacity this year and is in response to stakeholder requests.

The Discussion Paper aims to gather perspectives from all our stakeholders across the financial reporting ecosystem about the role of the auditor in relation to fraud and going concern in an audit of financial statements, and to obtain input on matters about whether our standards related to fraud and going concern remain fit-for-purpose in the current environment. The input from this consultation, together with other information gathering and outreach activities, will inform IAASB decisions about possible further actions on these topics.

If you would like to know more about the IAASB’s work on fraud and going concern, including the recent roundtables on these topics, please visit the project pages on fraud and going concern. The IAASB also encourages all interested stakeholders to respond to this Discussion Paper, including investors and other users of financial statements, those charged with governance of entities, preparers of financial statements, national standard setters, professional accountancy organizations, academics, regulators and audit oversight bodies, auditors and audit firms, and others where interested.

These videos—available in English, French, Mandarin and Spanish—explain the key aspects of the new and revised quality management standards to help stakeholders begin their implementation efforts.

Focusing on the effective and consistent application of our standards, the IAASB has published a new communique detailing its next steps to address complexity, understandability, scalability, and proportionality, including in the audits of financial statements of less complex entities.

The communique details the IAASB’s efforts to balance the needs of all its stakeholders by developing a separate standard focused on less complex entities while simultaneously addressing complexity, understandability, scalability and proportionality in the International Standards on Auditing more broadly.

Focusing on the effective and consistent application of our standards, the IAASB is addressing issues and challenges related to complexity, understandability, scalability and proportionality. While there is a particular focus on audits of less complex entities, the work is also considering the suite of ISAs more broadly. This Communique highlights our efforts and sets out what we are planning.

Ahead of the anticipated release of the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board’s suite of new quality management standards following Public Interest Oversight Board approval later this year, the IAASB has developed implementation plans for each of the three standards. The plans explain what implementation materials stakeholders can anticipate, topics covered, and expected timing.