Skip to main content
  • Building a Coherent, Global Approach to Corporate Reporting

    English

    Investors, stakeholders, and society at large need to understand the value of companies beyond what they can glean from conventional financial reports – and this need is even more pressing during uncertain times such as the present.

    IFAC today published its response to Accountancy Europe’s consultation, Interconnected Standard Setting for Corporate Reporting, which addresses the evolution of standard setting to enhance corporate reporting at the global level.

    The current corporate reporting system needs to evolve quickly to deal with the challenge posed by a myriad of different jurisdictional requirements and an absence of widely agreed standards in various areas beyond financial reporting. The result is variable quality and lack of comparability, leading to greater cost and inefficient capital allocation for both companies and investors.

    As indicated in the IFAC point-of-view on enhancing corporate reporting, a global solution is needed to achieve relevant, reliable, and comparable narrative information and metrics.

    “The current reporting ecosystem does not best serve the interests of capital markets, companies or their stakeholders,” said IFAC CEO Kevin Dancey. “The options set out by Accountancy Europe to change the corporate reporting system are useful for furthering the dialogue toward a global and coherent solution. We look forward to continuing this conversation with key stakeholders.”

    In its response to the consultation, IFAC endorsed six recommendations to secure an integrated global reporting structure. These include development of a global approach to international standard-setting, a conceptual framework for corporate reporting, and an oversight structure.

    A global approach to these three elements— oversight, framework, and standards—is urgently needed in order to enhance corporate reporting.  While this is a challenging time for investors, companies and capital markets, the competition for capital will become more challenging, and the demand for relevant and candid information about organizations will be needed to reliably inform decisions about capital allocation and investor and other stakeholder’s assessments of long-term value creation.

    Feedback on the consultation is due by April 30.  IFAC encourages stakeholders to contribute their views to this valuable consultation.

  • IFAC Releases the Fourth Installment of "Exploring the IESBA Code"

    English

    IFAC today released the latest installment of its Exploring the IESBA Code educational series: The Conceptual Framework–Step 3, Addressing Threats.

    Exploring the IESBA Code is a twelve-month series providing an in-depth look at the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (the Code). Each installment focuses on a specific aspect of the Code using real-world situations in a manner that is relatable and practical. Readers will gain a better understanding of the thought process behind important aspects of the Code through storytelling and expert analysis from professionals involved in developing the standards.

    Previous installments of Exploring the IESBA Code looked at the Code’s five fundamental principles and key aspects of the conceptual framework, which is a specified approach that all professional accountants are required to use to identify, evaluate and address threats to compliance with those principles. Installment four focuses on addressing threats.

    A professional accountant can often come across complex or challenging situations that are not black and white. These challenging situations require ethical considerations, some of which are expressly dealt with in the Code. This  unique and informational series was developed by IFAC in collaboration with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) to help explain how the Code assists in navigating some of these challenges.

    To read and download this and future installments, visit the IFAC website.

    Exploring the IESBA Code was published by IFAC and does not form part of the Code. It is non-authoritative and is not a substitute for reading the Code.

    For more information about the Code, please click here

    An Informational Series to Promote the Code of Ethics

  • Join us! IESBA Technology Initiative Webinar on April 20

    English

    All stakeholders are invited to register and participate.

    The IESBA invites you to join a 45-minute webinar on Monday, April 20, 2020 at 4pm EDT to hear about its initiative on exploring the ethics implications arising from the transformative effects of technological trends and developments on the accounting, assurance, and finance functions. 

    During the webinar, the IESBA’s Technology Task Force Chair, Brian Friedrich, will outline the background to the initiative and explain the key findings and recommendations in the IESBA’s Technology Working Group’s Phase 1 Report. Don’t miss out on this wonderful opportunity to learn about the IESBA’s work in this strategic area for the global accountancy profession.

    This webinar will be recorded. If you are interested in joining but unable to attend, please register and a link to the recording will be provided.

    Click the link below to register:

    • Monday April 20, 2020 at 4pm Eastern

    If you have any questions, please email Astu Tilahun at astu@ethicsboard.org.

  • IAASB Web Page Offers Guidance for Auditors During the Coronavirus Pandemic

    English

    The COVID-19 pandemic is a global health and humanitarian crisis. Beyond the significant challenges that lay ahead in all facets of life, the pandemic has the potential to significantly impact the way that audits are undertaken.

    The IAASB has created a COVID-19 web page to help our stakeholders, and the larger accounting community, navigate some of the challenges ahead.

    Click HERE to learn more.

  • IAASB Consults on Extended External Reporting (EER) Assurance

    English

    Organizations are increasingly reporting about their broader performance or impact (“Extended External Reporting” or “EER”) either voluntarily or as required by law or regulation, and there is a growing demand for assurance engagements on such reporting. In response, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) has developed for feedback it’s non-authoritative EER Guidance and is requesting public input by July 13, 2020.

    “Extended external reporting and the role it has to play will only continue to grow in importance,” said Tom Seidenstein, Chair of the IAASB. “It’s a very exciting time for the IAASB as the work we’re undertaking today to develop international assurance guidance for non-financial information in the form of EER will, we believe, pave the way for much greater engagement and consistency in this area.  We welcome and encourage all feedback during our comment period, which runs through July 13, and look forward to learning from the comments we receive.”

    EER encapsulates many different forms of reporting including, but not limited to, integrated reporting, sustainability reporting and other reporting by entities about financial and non-financial matters, including environmental, social and governance matters, related to an entity’s activities.

    The purpose of the IAASB’s Public Consultation on Proposed Guidance, Extended External Reporting Assurance is to promote consistent high-quality application of ISAE 3000 (Revised) Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information so as to:

    • Strengthen the influence of EER assurance engagements on the quality of EER reports;
    • Enhance user trust in the resulting assurance reports; and
    • Engender greater confidence in the credibility of, trust in and reliance upon EER reports by their intended users.

    The draft non-authoritative guidance addresses Special Considerations in Performing Assurance Engagements on Extended External Reporting.

    Importance of Feedback

    Input received will assist the IAASB in finalizing the non-authoritative guidance document. Comments are also invited on two supplementary documents, should respondents wish to comment on their content, structure and relationship to the draft guidance document – Supplement A: Credibility and Trust Model and Background and Contextual Information and Supplement B: Illustrative Examples.

    The IAASB invites input from all stakeholders, especially those with practical experience in this evolving area of reporting, including practitioners and other experts involved in performing EER assurance engagements, preparers of EER reports, investors and other users of EER reports and assurance reports on them, standard setters, and regulators.

    The IAASB’s EER Assurance project is being run with the support of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development. This work is part of a conservation and financial markets collaboration among Ceres, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, World Wildlife Fund and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. For more information, please visit www.moore.org

    Aspects for Consideration

    This draft non-authoritative guidance covers the following aspects of the performance of an EER assurance engagement where practitioners commonly encounter challenges in applying ISAE 3000 (Revised):

    • Applying appropriate competence and capabilities to an EER engagement;
    • Exercising professional skepticism and professional judgment in the context of an EER engagement, where there may be a heightened need to do so;
    • Determining preconditions and agreeing the scope of an EER assurance engagement;
    • Determining the suitability and availability of criteria (reporting framework(s), standards or preparer-developed criteria) used to prepare the EER report;
    • The preparer’s governance and internal control over its process to prepare the EER report;
    • Considering an entity’s process to develop preparer-developed criteria to determine the topics to be reported on in the entity’s EER report (sometimes referred to as a preparer’s ‘materiality process’);
    • The types of misstatements that may occur in the EER report (using assertions);
    • Obtaining evidence;
    • Considering the materiality of misstatements in the EER report;
    • Preparing the assurance report;
    • Considerations in addressing qualitative EER information; and
    • Considerations in addressing future-oriented EER information.

    Click HERE for more info.

    About the IAASB

    The IAASB develops auditing and assurance standards and guidance for use by all professional accountants under a shared standard-setting process involving the Public Interest Oversight Board, which oversees the activities of the IAASB, and the IAASB Consultative Advisory Group, which provides public interest input into the development of the standards and guidance. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IAASB are facilitated by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). For copyright, trademark, and permissions information, please go to permissions or contact permissions@ifac.org.

     

     

  • IFAC Releases the Third Installment of "Exploring the IESBA Code"

    English

    IFAC today released the latest installment of its Exploring the IESBA Code educational series: The Conceptual Framework–Step 2, Evaluating Threats.

    Exploring the IESBA Code is a twelve-month series providing an in-depth look at the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (the Code). Each installment focuses on a specific aspect of the Code using real-world situations in a manner that is relatable and practical. Readers will gain a better understanding of the thought process behind important aspects of the Code through storytelling and expert analysis from professionals involved in developing the standards.

    The first installment of the Series looked at the Code’s five Fundamental Principles, which establish the standard of behavior expected of all professional accountants. The second installment highlighted the Code’s Conceptual Framework with a focus on identifying threats, while this third installment focuses on how to evaluate those identified threats.

    A professional accountant can often come across complex or challenging situations that are not black and white. These challenging situations require ethical considerations, some of which are expressly dealt with in the Code. The unique and informational series was developed by IFAC in collaboration with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) to help explain how the Code assists in navigating some of these challenges.

    To read and download this and future installments, visit the IFAC website.

    The Exploring the IESBA Code was published by IFAC and does not form part of the Code. It is non-authoritative and is not a substitute for reading the Code.

    For more information about the Code, please click here.

    An Informational Series to Promote the Code of Ethics

  • Global Ethics Board Releases Report Exploring the Ethical Implications of Technology for Accountants

    English

    The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) today released its Phase One Report exploring the ethical implications of technology on the accounting, assurance, and finance functions.

    The report is the culmination of the first phase of fact-finding work the global ethics standard-setting board initiated in recognition of the pace and magnitude of change caused by disruptive technological innovations. The initial phase of the initiative was led by the IESBA’s Technology Working Group (TWG).

    In its findings, the TWG concluded that, generally, the IESBA’s International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (the Code) currently provides high level, principles-based guidance for most technology-related ethics issues that professional accountants and firms might encounter. However, the report cites various findings and sets out recommendations grouped into five key topical areas where material in the Code could be enhanced.

    “Over the last few years, the pace, significance and complexity of technology advances, such as machine learning, have given rise to new opportunities and challenges for the accountancy profession,” said Dr. Stavros Thomadakis, IESBA Chair, adding “The effective organization and delivery of services are already undergoing major change. The global accountancy profession will have to recognize and address new ethical challenges in a rapidly changing technological environment. The IESBA Technology Working Group has delivered a comprehensive and informative report in this strategic area. This lays the groundwork for our substantive and timely response to ethical and public interest challenges posed by radical technological change.”

    The report also includes other recommendations for the next phase of the initiative, including that the IESBA conducts additional information gathering with respect to the ethical implications of other technological developments such as blockchain, cybersecurity and Internet of Things.

    Click here for more information.

  • New Report Examines Why Accrual information is Critical to the Public Sector

    English

    A new report by ACCA and IFAC highlights the benefits of accrual information in the public sector and identifies the positive impact on citizen lives.  

    In interviewing 20+ public sector experts – including IPSASB Board member Neema Kiure-Mssusa, IPSASB Program and Technical Director Ross Smith, and IPSASB Principal Joao Fonseca – the report also provides 30 recommendations for governments to improve accrual implementation.

    In asking “Is Cash Still King?” IFAC and ACCA examine how important accrual information is for a strong public sector, economy, and citizen well-being. Aligned with these outcomes, the IPSASB remains committed to the strategic objective of strengthening public financial management by increasing adoption of accrual-based IPSAS. [Hear our Chair, Ian Carruthers, discuss how the IPSASB works to strengthen public financial management.]

    We encourage you to read the report and to share with your stakeholders.

    There are more public sector insights available on our YouTube playlist. In particular, check out: